Saturday, May 18, 2019

Huck Finn Censorship Synthesis

In this modern day and age, everything offends someone. Eating at Chick-fil-A hurts the LGBT community, going to assemble the latest Adam Sandler movie gets the Jewish mad at you- so why is it surprising that turn back twosomes The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is being changed to please people? Whether they be teachers, students, black or white, there direct be no change in Huck Finn. And if any change were to be made- that would be censorship. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn portrays a message that cannot be missed about the racist ideals of society at that time.Using demeaning spoken language kindred coon and injun serve purpose in Twains work. His repetition of ugly phrases bid those show just how ugly community values were back then. In Source B, Gribben admits to changing those words to more family friendly terms, specific all(prenominal)y slave and Indian. Those are not always correct, though. Often times, nigger is dod from one African American to the other, to s how an acceptance of brotherhood and a communal taste of struggle. The replacement of slave is not correct in this case, or in others.Slave is defined as a person who is property of another. This is not accurate either, considering Jim, the main African American character in the book, ran outdoor(a) from his owner and no longer held that specific job. Even if he were still a slave, the field would not be correct at all. African Americans were never kindly titled slave. They were natural language at, and the harsh use of the word nigger slapped them across the face like it does to students across the country who see it now (Source D).Taking away Twains intimately purposefully placed word completely takes away from his message. Without the original vocabulary, society cannot learn the important message that Twain is trying to teach. Twains use of nigger is like a whole new form of imagery. Many students shift uncomfortably in their desks when they hear it out loud, some will eve n go as far as claiming to nauseate the book because of the tense and demeaning language (Source A). This is what Twain wanted.The use of nigger has not changed at all over the years, and ignoring it would be equivalent to ignoring an entire chapter of our history books, one that very much defined our country. The poster-word for the disparity of African Americans is nigger, therefore Huck Finn would be ripped of its historical accuracy if the word were removed. Twain wants reders to see with the books victims, because only then would his readers be able to understand the harsh pain of the word. Twains message is simple nigger is not okay.But there is no other way to base this than to force it upon the reader. Twain was and continues to be a literary genius. His willingness to take a chance and make a reader empathize and feel something is what makes his book such a learning experience. Stripping the book of its most infamous word, nigger, cowards away from its most obvious messa ge. If everything mildly offensive was censored, there would be postal code left to read. So instead of complaining about history, enjoy the beauty of Twains book, vitiate some Chick-fil-A, and the rent the newest Adam Sandler movie- before its too late.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.